Sparkling Royal Jewels From Around the World
 |
| Princess Anna’s Small Diamond Fringe Tiara (Photo: Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images) |
 |
| The Duchess of Cambridge visits Cornwall (Photo: Chris Jackson – WPA Pool/Getty Images) |
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge embarked on a mini-tour of Cornwall this morning, and Kate’s daytime jewelry uniform — Kiki earrings, Cartier watch, wedding/engagement/eternity rings — was on full display.
 |
| Photo: Chris Jackson – WPA Pool/Getty Images |
The earrings Kate wore for her morning engagements were the gold and diamond hoops with detachable morganite drops. It’s tough to see in some images, but the morganites are a very, very pale shade of pink.
 |
| Photo: Chris Jackson – WPA Pool/Getty Images |
Kate echoed the pink with a new dress from Lela Rose. I’m already anticipating your jewelry responses, because I expect that many of you are as weary of the uniform as I’m becoming, but I’ll leave you with two thoughts. Number one: wouldn’t the daytime uniform be SO much more exciting if it included a brooch, QEII-style? And number two: don’t complain too much — she could be wearing the leaf earrings again!
 |
| The Belgian Sapphire Tiara (Photo: SAEED KHAN/AFP/Getty Images) |
Welcome to September, magpies — AKA the Month of the Glorious Sapphire! Let’s kick things off with a post about a British sapphire tiara that isn’t in danger of leaving the country: the Belgian Sapphire Tiara.
 |
| Photo: Central Press/Hulton Archive/Getty Images |
You’ll also sometimes see this tiara called the “Victorian Sapphire Tiara,” and that’s because it was acquired to coordinate with a set of Victorian-era sapphire jewels that the Queen already owned. She received the suite of sapphires — a necklace and earrings (later supplemented by a bracelet and ring) — from her father, King George VI, as a wedding present in 1947. (Hence, it’s also sometimes called the “George VI Sapphire Tiara. So many names!) The pieces were a century old, reportedly made around 1850. Noel Coward apparently called the gems “the largest sapphires [he had] ever seen.”
In 1963, ten years after she was crowned, the Queen decided to supplement her father’s sapphires with a tiara. She purchased a piece of jewelry that already had royal provenance — a nineteenth-century sapphire necklace that had once belonged to Princess Louise of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (born Princess Louise of Belgium). Louise had a bit of a spending problem, to say the least.
To satisfy her debts, her father, King Leopold II, auctioned off all of the jewels that had been left to her by her late mother, Queen Henriette. Whether or not this particular necklace was in that group of auctioned jewels is unclear to me, but at some point, the sapphires were definitely sold.
 |
| Photo: GERRY PENNY/AFP/Getty Images |
After it was purchased by Elizabeth II, the necklace was set on a frame, and since then, it has been worn by the queen exclusively as a tiara. When you look closely at the piece, its former life as a necklace is clear — gems that now stand upright would have been articulated drops on Louise’s necklace. Apparently the piece wasn’t created to be easily converted back to a necklace, which is a shame — you all know I have a soft spot for royal jewels that can pull double duty.
 |
| Photo: Toby Melville – WPA Pool /Getty Images |
The Queen wore this piece fairly frequently from the ’60s until the early ’90s, and then it retreated into the royal vaults for decades. Last autumn, however, the tiara made a surprise reappearance at a state banquet for the Chinese president. The Queen wears “white” jewels for evening almost exclusively these days, so it was exciting to see her bring out a bit of color for a change.