July 29, 1981: Marriage of Charles and Diana at St. Paul’s Cathedral (Photo: STR/AFP/Getty Images) |
Jewel History: Hiring Jewelry in London (1913)
Detail of Giovanni Boldini’s 1911 portrait of Princess Marthe Bibesco (Image: Grand Ladies Site) |
Jewels are rented by the day or night in London. This jewel renting is now the most popular thing in the way of acquiring “borrowed plumage” [1].
The renting of jewels started years ago, but has increased rapidly and is now at the height of its popularity. The fact that jewels can be rented is just being discovered by those of the great “middle class,” who are hastening to take advantage of it. Already the poor but haughty lady of rank who wished to keep the world from knowing her real financial condition has learned the secrets of this borrowed finery.
Laurits Tuxen’s “The Anointing of Queen Alexandra” (Image: Wikimedia Commons) |
The first time that jewel renting was introduced into England was at the coronation of King Edward [2]. Women of rank who wished to appear in the magnificent ceremonies found that they had no jewels worthy of the great occasion. So they went to the well-known jewelers with their lamentations.
A few of the jewelers refused absolutely to have anything to do with jewel renting, but others, scenting a way to make money quickly and without risk, consented to lend some of their choicest designs for the coronation. At this time, the fact that the jewels were rented was kept a complete secret, and the women borrowers had the satisfaction of appearing in magnificent jewels at a small cost each evening.
This gave jewelers the idea of renting jewelry at all times. They let it be known that, for such and such a sum, they would rent beautiful brooches, rings, necklaces, and tiaras. They had many kinds of precious stones set into odd designs.
Women model the latest fashions, ca. September 1913 (Photo: Topical Press Agency/Getty Images) |
These rented jewels could not be advertised. One word printed about them in the newspapers would ruin their renting value at once, for no one would rent jewels if there was the slightest chance of their origin being suspected. Advertising them by word of mouth became the popular method. Even now not much has been said in the press about them.
Poor women of gentle breeding who were not above earning “an honest penny” were taken into the confidence of the jeweler. Now, when a big entertainment is to take place, or before the opera season starts, these women whisper to their friends: “Now, if you only had a few more jewels, your appearance would be perfect.”
“But I haven’t the money for jewels,” is the answer.
“Don’t buy them,” whispers the woman who is employed to introduce the rented finery. “I’ll tell you a secret. ____ and ____ will rent jewels to you. Everybody is renting them and it’s the only way now that times are so hard.”
The woman who wants to look beautiful hurries to the jeweler, and the woman who is doing the advertising has earned another neat commission.
Aristocrats at the coronation of King George V, May 1910 (Photo: Topical Press Agency/Getty Images) |
Years ago, people who could not afford real jewels bought paste imitations. Although some of these seemed real, and they were made up in choice designs that glittered and sparkled on their fair wearers, they were not received with favor. Paste jewels grew ordinary and finally descended to the shop girls, where they have remained. The rented jewels have proved an acceptable substitute. So great has the practice grown that at the coronation of King George [3], millions of dollars’ worth of hired jewels were worn by society, and no one was the wiser.
Some of the better jewelers are strongly opposed to this borrowed plumage fad. They say that it is hurting legitimate trade: that the woman who contemplated buying a valuable tiara will borrow one for the few formal occasions when it is worn. By borrowing one of the same design for several occasions, she gets all the credit of owning it with none of the necessary expenditure of money.
The jewelers who do the renting are, of course, enthusiastic over the plan and are planning to increase it each year. By careful renting, they are able to get as much, during the season, as a piece of jewelry is worth and still have the original in their possession.
Women attending Royal Ascot, ca. 1913 (Photo: Grand Ladies Site) |
Not everyone can rent jewelry, even in London. The renter must be “a responsible person.” Even those who are responsible are apt to be rather great risks, so the jewels are insured, the lady who rents them paying for the insurance.
Since the renting of jewels and the insurance has been arranged to the smallest detail, it is now possible to hire jewels by the week, month, or even by the year. No longer is it necessary to hire by the evening only. A woman may hire a lovely necklace of pearls for the London season. She may rent many thousands of dollars’ worth of jewels for a period of two years.
Lady Cynthia Asquith, ca. 1912 (Photo: Grand Ladies Site) |
Many matrons with marriageable daughters are hiring whole outfits of jewels for themselves, in order to impress possible future sons-in-law with their worldly wealth. After the wedding, the jewels go back to the jewelers, to be snapped up by another prospective mother-in-law.
The borrowed jewelry may be taken out of London now. In fact, the wearer may take it wherever she goes, except to Russia and Spain.
NOTES
1. PLEASE NOTE: I have no evidence that any of the jewels worn in any of the photos included in this post were rented rather than owned! They’re included as examples of jewelry and clothing worn during the era when the article was published.
2. The coronation of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra of the United Kingdom was held at Westminster Abbey in London on August 9, 1902.
3. The coronation of King George V and Queen Mary of the United Kingdom was held at Westminster Abbey in London on May 6, 1910.
Royal Ruby Necklaces
Queen Sofia of Spain wears pieces from her ruby suite (Photo: Carlos Alvarez/Pool/Getty Images) |
Here in my corner of the United States, July is drawing to a hot and muggy close. To help brighten things up, let’s have another look at more royals wearing July’s birthstone — this time, in necklace form!
Photo: ROBERT MICHAEL/AFP/Getty Images |
The gorgeous Crown Ruby Necklace — one of the treasured British heirlooms of the crown — was designed by Prince Albert, husband of Queen Victoria. It was originally set with opals, but Queen Alexandra chose to have those stones replaced with stunning, blood-red rubies at the turn of the twentieth century. Today, it’s worn by Queen Elizabeth II.
Photo: FIONA HANSON/AFP/Getty Images |
The Queen Mother wore the crown rubies during her lifetime, so Queen Elizabeth II bought a ruby necklace of her own — the Baring Ruby Necklace — in 1964. The necklace has three distinct pendants, two of which many have originally been made as earring drops.
Photo: STRINGER/AFP/Getty Images |
The Queen also had another diamond and ruby necklace in her jewelry box. Her bejeweled wedding gift haul in 1947 included this v-shaped necklace, which was made by Boucheron in 1907 for Mrs. Greville. The Queen Mother inherited the piece and passed it along to her daughter, who wore it quite a lot during the early years of her marriage.
Photo: Chris Jackson – WPA Pool/Getty Images |
Here’s how big Queen Elizabeth II’s jewelry collection is: this is her fourth significant diamond and ruby necklace. It’s a swagged diamond necklace set with two cabochon rubies; it was a gift from the Emir of Qatar in the 1980s.
Photo: Ian Gavan/Getty Images |
Across the Channel in the Netherlands, Queen Maxima wears the heck out of the gorgeous necklace from the family’s Mellerio Ruby Parure. The piece was made in 1889 for Queen Emma. Three rows of round diamonds are gathered by an elaborate, off-center diamond and ruby floral clasp.
Photo: Carlos Alvarez/Getty Images |
Queen Sofia of Spain received a parure of ruby and diamond jewels from Stavros Niarchos as a wedding gift. The set, which was made by Van Cleef and Arpels, includes this diamond and ruby cluster necklace, which features substantial cabochon stones. She’s worn the necklace on some of the most important days of her life, including the proclamation of her husband as king.
Photo: Carlos Alvarez/Getty Images |
Queen Sofia’s most sentimental ruby piece, however, is this diamond and cabochon ruby pendant, which she often wears on a pearl necklace. The pendant is a legacy from her mother, Queen Friederike of Greece.
Photo: Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images |
The former Greek royals still have a major ruby necklace of their own. This piece, which is set with diamonds and pigeon’s blood rubies, features three large diamond and ruby pendants. It is usually worn with the family’s distinctive Ruby Olive Wreath Tiara.
Photo: Chris Jackson/Getty Images |
The ruby necklace worn today by Crown Princess Mary of Denmark has an astonishing history: it was worn by Desiree Clary (later Queen of Sweden) at the coronation of Napoleon Bonaparte in the Cathedral of Notre Dame in 1804. Note how smaller rubies are clustered to create the impression of larger stones!
Photo: Henning Bagger/AFP/Getty Images |
Crown Princess Mary also has another necklace set with diamonds, rubies, and spinels. It dates to the Edwardian era and can be worn as a tiara; it was purchased at auction in 2012.
Photo: Chris Jackson – WPA Pool/Getty Images |
Perhaps the largest ruby necklaces worn by a royal today are those from the collection of the Duchess of Cornwall. Camilla wore this lacy, intricate diamond and ruby necklace at a film premiere in 2015.
Photo: Steven M. Falk/AFP/Getty Images |
But the most imposing of all is surely the ruby necklace she received from the Saudis. It’s enormous and must be incredibly difficult to wear, so perhaps it’s not surprising that she’s only donned it once in public!
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 613
- 614
- 615
- 616
- 617
- …
- 806
- Next Page »